aggregator.ink

← All comparisons

Squid vs LI.FI / Jumper

How Squid and LI.FI / Jumper differ on routing, chains and what they’re best at.

SquidLI.FI / Jumper
CategoryBridge aggregatorBridge aggregator
TypeSolver auctionRoute-quote
How it worksCross-chain swaps powered by Axelar’s General Message Passing, with the CORAL solver auction filling after deposit for tighter pricing. Covers 100+ chains.Aggregates bridges and cross-chain DEXes, returning a quoted output before you sign. LI.FI is the SDK/API; Jumper.exchange is the consumer front-end. Routes EVM, Solana and Bitcoin (via Mayan).
Chains100+ (EVM, Cosmos, Solana)30+ (EVM, Solana, Bitcoin)
Highlight100+ chains · only native Cosmos option$0.94 on $1k ETH→ARB · ~22s
Best forWidest coverage + CosmosThe safe EVM↔EVM default

Squid

  • Widest chain coverage (100+, incl. 12 Cosmos)
  • Only native option for Cosmos
  • Solver auction tightens pricing
  • Solver auction adds a brief fill window
  • More complex than EVM-only tools

LI.FI / Jumper

  • Safest, most-integrated bridge aggregator
  • Best benchmark cost on EVM transfers
  • Jumper UI + LI.FI API
  • Route-quote exposes slippage if a route fills slowly
  • Not native to Cosmos

Bottom line

Pick Squid for widest coverage + cosmos; pick LI.FI / Jumper for the safe evm↔evm default.