aggregator.ink

CoW Swap vs KyberSwap

How CoW Swap and KyberSwap differ on routing, chains and what they’re best at.

CoW SwapKyberSwap
CategoryDEX aggregatorDEX aggregator
TypeBatch auctionMeta-aggregator
How it worksBatches all orders into a ~30s auction; solvers compete to find the settlement that maximizes total surplus, with uniform clearing prices and Coincidence-of-Wants that eliminate sandwich MEV.The KyberSwap Aggregator routes across Uniswap, Sushi, Curve and dozens more plus Kyber’s own Elastic/Classic AMMs. KyberSwap × NEAR Intents (2026) routes native BTC/DOGE/NEAR without wrapped assets.
ChainsEthereum, Gnosis, Arbitrum, Base15+ EVM (+ NEAR Intents)
Highlight~22% of ETH aggregator volume~31% of ETH aggregator volume (2026)
Best forLarge trades + MEV protectionTop ETH share + native BTC routing

CoW Swap

  • Best execution on large trades
  • Eliminates sandwich MEV by design
  • Coincidence-of-Wants can beat AMM price
  • ~30s batch adds latency
  • Fewer chains than 1inch

KyberSwap

  • Highest Ethereum aggregator share (2026)
  • Routes own + external liquidity
  • Native BTC/DOGE via NEAR Intents
  • History includes the 2023 Elastic exploit
  • KNC less prominent

Bottom line

Pick CoW Swap for large trades + mev protection; pick KyberSwap for top eth share + native btc routing.